<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 558 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246121</link>
    <description>The case addressed the inclusion of preoperative interest expenses in computing book profit under Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal ruled against including such expenses, citing precedents like Apollo Tyres Limited. Additionally, a separate case emphasized the limited jurisdiction of Assessing Officers in examining audited accounts prepared as per the Companies Act. The Court dismissed the appeal, emphasizing compliance with statutory requirements and restricting Assessing Officers&#039; authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2014 06:23:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352460" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 558 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246121</link>
      <description>The case addressed the inclusion of preoperative interest expenses in computing book profit under Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal ruled against including such expenses, citing precedents like Apollo Tyres Limited. Additionally, a separate case emphasized the limited jurisdiction of Assessing Officers in examining audited accounts prepared as per the Companies Act. The Court dismissed the appeal, emphasizing compliance with statutory requirements and restricting Assessing Officers&#039; authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246121</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>