<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 848 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164022</link>
    <description>Marble goods found on inspection to be tiles of uniform shape and size, capable of use without further treatment, were classified as marble tiles rather than marble stones. Applying the earlier ruling on marble tiles, the Court held that such goods fell under entry No. 67 of Notification No. 5784 and were taxable at 12%, not under entry No. 40 of Notification No. 5785 at 6%. The Tribunal&#039;s classification was upheld and the dealer&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2014 14:10:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352410" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 848 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164022</link>
      <description>Marble goods found on inspection to be tiles of uniform shape and size, capable of use without further treatment, were classified as marble tiles rather than marble stones. Applying the earlier ruling on marble tiles, the Court held that such goods fell under entry No. 67 of Notification No. 5784 and were taxable at 12%, not under entry No. 40 of Notification No. 5785 at 6%. The Tribunal&#039;s classification was upheld and the dealer&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164022</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>