<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 542 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246105</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Cenvat Credit demand of Rs.1,58,353/- with interest and penalty. It set aside the service tax liability on payments to the holding company for expatriate employees, ruling that the employees could not be considered as employees of the holding company. Additionally, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on the service tax liability for payments made to Wharton Business School for the survey, stating it did not fall under Business Auxiliary Service. The appeal against this issue was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2014 12:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352396" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 542 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246105</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Cenvat Credit demand of Rs.1,58,353/- with interest and penalty. It set aside the service tax liability on payments to the holding company for expatriate employees, ruling that the employees could not be considered as employees of the holding company. Additionally, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on the service tax liability for payments made to Wharton Business School for the survey, stating it did not fall under Business Auxiliary Service. The appeal against this issue was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246105</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>