https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246101 The Commission found the opposite party No. 1 in violation of its order dated 31.01.2012 for continuing to impose unfair conditions and issuing illegal demand letters under the "super area" concept. Consequently, the Commission imposed a penalty of Rs. 50,000 per day of non-compliance from 28.11.2012, amounting to Rs. 2,41,50,000, with an additional Rs. 1 Lakh per day if non-compliance persisted, capping at Rs. 10 crores. The opposite party was directed to pay the fine within 60 days and comply with revised agreement terms, rendering the demand letters non-binding on the applicants. The secretary was tasked with notifying the parties. en-us Wed, 26 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Apr 2014 13:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246101 The Commission found the opposite party No. 1 in violation of its order dated 31.01.2012 for continuing to impose unfair conditions and issuing illegal demand letters under the "super area" concept. Consequently, the Commission imposed a penalty of Rs. 50,000 per day of non-compliance from 28.11.2012, amounting to Rs. 2,41,50,000, with an additional Rs. 1 Lakh per day if non-compliance persisted, capping at Rs. 10 crores. The opposite party was directed to pay the fine within 60 days and comply with revised agreement terms, rendering the demand letters non-binding on the applicants. The secretary was tasked with notifying the parties. Case-Laws Law of Competition Wed, 26 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246101