<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 537 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246100</link>
    <description>The court quashed the notice for reopening the assessment as it was based on an incorrect reference to a provision not applicable to the petitioner&#039;s claim for exemption under section 54 of the Income Tax Act, rather than section 54E. The court emphasized that the reasons for reopening must be solely supported by the assessing officer&#039;s recorded grounds, leading to the petition being allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2015 12:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352390" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 537 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246100</link>
      <description>The court quashed the notice for reopening the assessment as it was based on an incorrect reference to a provision not applicable to the petitioner&#039;s claim for exemption under section 54 of the Income Tax Act, rather than section 54E. The court emphasized that the reasons for reopening must be solely supported by the assessing officer&#039;s recorded grounds, leading to the petition being allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246100</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>