<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 528 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246091</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under Section 263, ruling that the Assessing Officer had conducted sufficient inquiries during the assessment. The Commissioner&#039;s reliance on the AO&#039;s proposal was deemed impermissible. The AO adequately verified the bank entries and property improvement costs, with no evidence of errors or revenue prejudice. The appeal by the assessee was successful.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2014 16:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352380" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 528 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246091</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under Section 263, ruling that the Assessing Officer had conducted sufficient inquiries during the assessment. The Commissioner&#039;s reliance on the AO&#039;s proposal was deemed impermissible. The AO adequately verified the bank entries and property improvement costs, with no evidence of errors or revenue prejudice. The appeal by the assessee was successful.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246091</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>