<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 827 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164013</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, emphasizing the bar on limitation for rectification proceedings. The AO&#039;s attempt to rectify the order u/s 154 was deemed beyond the permissible time limit, leading to the quashing of the proceedings initiated by the AO. The Tribunal did not address the disallowance of 90% of miscellaneous income and its impact on deduction u/s 80HHC due to the primary finding on jurisdiction and limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2014 12:39:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352367" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 827 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164013</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, emphasizing the bar on limitation for rectification proceedings. The AO&#039;s attempt to rectify the order u/s 154 was deemed beyond the permissible time limit, leading to the quashing of the proceedings initiated by the AO. The Tribunal did not address the disallowance of 90% of miscellaneous income and its impact on deduction u/s 80HHC due to the primary finding on jurisdiction and limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164013</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>