<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 830 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164008</link>
    <description>Documentary entries showing rice husk and paddy husk as separate commodities were treated as admissions, and an unsupported explanation that the terms were used interchangeably could not displace those records. The turnover therefore had to be bifurcated, and purchase tax was payable on the rice husk turnover. Tax under section 3F of the U.P. Trade Tax Act applied only to movable property; plant and machinery treated as permanently attached to earth were not movable goods and no tax was payable on the lease rent. The revisional relief was limited accordingly, with tax restored only on the rice husk turnover and the deletion of tax on lease rent maintained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2014 14:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352362" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 830 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164008</link>
      <description>Documentary entries showing rice husk and paddy husk as separate commodities were treated as admissions, and an unsupported explanation that the terms were used interchangeably could not displace those records. The turnover therefore had to be bifurcated, and purchase tax was payable on the rice husk turnover. Tax under section 3F of the U.P. Trade Tax Act applied only to movable property; plant and machinery treated as permanently attached to earth were not movable goods and no tax was payable on the lease rent. The revisional relief was limited accordingly, with tax restored only on the rice husk turnover and the deletion of tax on lease rent maintained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164008</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>