<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 519 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246082</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Director of Income-tax&#039;s decision to withdraw registration under section 12AA of the Income-tax Act for the trust. The Tribunal determined that the trust&#039;s main objective was the promotion of education, with letting out premises as a means to facilitate educational activities. It found that the incidental commercial activity of letting out premises did not change the trust&#039;s primary purpose, emphasizing that the trust&#039;s actions aligned with education promotion. Therefore, the Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, concluding that the withdrawal of registration was not in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2014 12:37:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352353" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 519 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246082</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Director of Income-tax&#039;s decision to withdraw registration under section 12AA of the Income-tax Act for the trust. The Tribunal determined that the trust&#039;s main objective was the promotion of education, with letting out premises as a means to facilitate educational activities. It found that the incidental commercial activity of letting out premises did not change the trust&#039;s primary purpose, emphasizing that the trust&#039;s actions aligned with education promotion. Therefore, the Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, concluding that the withdrawal of registration was not in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246082</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>