<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 517 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246080</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal. Various additions made by the AO were deleted by the Tribunal, emphasizing the need for proper evidence and satisfaction before disallowing expenses under the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal also differentiated between capital gains and business income, providing relief to the Assessee on certain disputed amounts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 May 2014 11:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352347" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 517 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246080</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal. Various additions made by the AO were deleted by the Tribunal, emphasizing the need for proper evidence and satisfaction before disallowing expenses under the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal also differentiated between capital gains and business income, providing relief to the Assessee on certain disputed amounts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246080</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>