<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 503 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246066</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit 50% of the duty within eight weeks and report compliance by a specified date, considering the financial capacity of the appellant and the recurring nature of the issue with multiple pending cases. The final disposal of the appeal was contingent upon the appellant&#039;s compliance with the directive, reflecting a balanced approach to prevent financial hardship while ensuring duty requirements are met.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2014 10:17:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352329" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 503 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246066</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit 50% of the duty within eight weeks and report compliance by a specified date, considering the financial capacity of the appellant and the recurring nature of the issue with multiple pending cases. The final disposal of the appeal was contingent upon the appellant&#039;s compliance with the directive, reflecting a balanced approach to prevent financial hardship while ensuring duty requirements are met.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246066</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>