https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163998 Writ jurisdiction was held inappropriate where the challenge to an assessment order turned on disputed factual questions, including whether the purchasing dealer had exhausted the exemption ceiling before the assessment year and whether the eligibility certificate had been issued or acted upon consistently with the governing scheme. The Court noted that such issues could not be satisfactorily resolved on writ scrutiny and that an alternative statutory appeal was available to examine the factual and legal questions after hearing both sides. The writ petition was therefore not entertained, and the petitioner was left to pursue the appellate remedy. en-us Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Nov 2014 11:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163998 Writ jurisdiction was held inappropriate where the challenge to an assessment order turned on disputed factual questions, including whether the purchasing dealer had exhausted the exemption ceiling before the assessment year and whether the eligibility certificate had been issued or acted upon consistently with the governing scheme. The Court noted that such issues could not be satisfactorily resolved on writ scrutiny and that an alternative statutory appeal was available to examine the factual and legal questions after hearing both sides. The writ petition was therefore not entertained, and the petitioner was left to pursue the appellate remedy. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163998