<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 649 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163989</link>
    <description>A later exemption clarification fixing a 90-day period for dealers shifting from the 1981 scheme to the 1986 scheme under the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act could not be applied to a dealer who continued to seek benefit only under the 1981 scheme. The limitation operated only in switch-over cases, and rejection of the claim on the basis of that clause was therefore an incorrect construction of the exemption notifications. The petitioner&#039;s eligibility had to be examined under the 1981 scheme on its own terms, and the matter was required to be reconsidered on the merits of that scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352311" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 649 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163989</link>
      <description>A later exemption clarification fixing a 90-day period for dealers shifting from the 1981 scheme to the 1986 scheme under the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act could not be applied to a dealer who continued to seek benefit only under the 1981 scheme. The limitation operated only in switch-over cases, and rejection of the claim on the basis of that clause was therefore an incorrect construction of the exemption notifications. The petitioner&#039;s eligibility had to be examined under the 1981 scheme on its own terms, and the matter was required to be reconsidered on the merits of that scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163989</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>