<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 929 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163988</link>
    <description>Rectification of a revised assessment can operate as a fresh notice of demand where the assessing officer expressly amends the existing demand notice to reflect the revised demand. In that situation, a separate further notice is unnecessary, and recovery may proceed on the rectified demand notice. The absence of a new notice of demand is not a valid objection once the earlier notice has been formally rectified to incorporate the enhanced demand. If no stay is obtained, the assessee may be proceeded against as a defaulter on the basis of the rectified demand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2014 09:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352310" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 929 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163988</link>
      <description>Rectification of a revised assessment can operate as a fresh notice of demand where the assessing officer expressly amends the existing demand notice to reflect the revised demand. In that situation, a separate further notice is unnecessary, and recovery may proceed on the rectified demand notice. The absence of a new notice of demand is not a valid objection once the earlier notice has been formally rectified to incorporate the enhanced demand. If no stay is obtained, the assessee may be proceeded against as a defaulter on the basis of the rectified demand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163988</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>