https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246061 Private respondent's presence was treated as necessary, and the petitioner was directed to serve notice on the advocate representing the workman before the Labour Court, where proceedings under Section 33 C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 had already been filed. The matter was ordered to be listed under the heading "Motion" on 19 November 2013 in the supplementary list. The document is procedural in nature and records no adjudication on the merits of the dispute. en-us Thu, 07 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Apr 2014 17:20:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246061 Private respondent's presence was treated as necessary, and the petitioner was directed to serve notice on the advocate representing the workman before the Labour Court, where proceedings under Section 33 C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 had already been filed. The matter was ordered to be listed under the heading "Motion" on 19 November 2013 in the supplementary list. The document is procedural in nature and records no adjudication on the merits of the dispute. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 07 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246061