<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 643 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163964</link>
    <description>Under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, tax assessed or payable was given statutory priority over other claims against the dealer&#039;s property, and unpaid tax was treated as a charge on the assessee&#039;s assets. Applying the settled rule that a statutory first charge prevails over an earlier mortgage, the Madras HC held that the State&#039;s sales tax arrears ranked ahead of the appellant-bank&#039;s secured interest under an equitable mortgage. Earlier authorities recognising priority for statutory tax dues were followed, and the bank&#039;s reliance on a different line of cases was rejected as inapplicable on the facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2014 14:17:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352281" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 643 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163964</link>
      <description>Under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, tax assessed or payable was given statutory priority over other claims against the dealer&#039;s property, and unpaid tax was treated as a charge on the assessee&#039;s assets. Applying the settled rule that a statutory first charge prevails over an earlier mortgage, the Madras HC held that the State&#039;s sales tax arrears ranked ahead of the appellant-bank&#039;s secured interest under an equitable mortgage. Earlier authorities recognising priority for statutory tax dues were followed, and the bank&#039;s reliance on a different line of cases was rejected as inapplicable on the facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163964</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>