<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 696 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163950</link>
    <description>A sales tax concession granted by an earlier notification could be modified by a later amending notification, because the concession was an incentive created under statutory power and not a vested right. The court noted that the broad statutory meaning of &quot;timber&quot; encompassed converted timber, so the clarification bringing converted timber within the exclusion from concessional treatment was within the authority&#039;s power. The challenge that the notification was ultra vires therefore failed, the writ petitions were rejected, and the assessment orders remained undisturbed, with only the statutory appellate remedy left open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2014 11:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352267" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 696 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163950</link>
      <description>A sales tax concession granted by an earlier notification could be modified by a later amending notification, because the concession was an incentive created under statutory power and not a vested right. The court noted that the broad statutory meaning of &quot;timber&quot; encompassed converted timber, so the clarification bringing converted timber within the exclusion from concessional treatment was within the authority&#039;s power. The challenge that the notification was ultra vires therefore failed, the writ petitions were rejected, and the assessment orders remained undisturbed, with only the statutory appellate remedy left open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163950</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>