<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 495 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246058</link>
    <description>The Commercial Tax Tribunal granted an interim stay for 80% of the tax liability imposed on the sale of SIM cards and fixed telephone service rentals for the assessment year 2007-08. The Tribunal directed the revisionist to deposit the remaining 20% during the pendency of the first appeal. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering the prima facie case on merits and the financial condition of the appellant when granting interim relief, citing relevant legal precedents. The first appellate authority was instructed to expedite the appeal decision within two months and ordered a stay on coercive measures against the assessee during this period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 May 2014 14:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352226" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 495 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246058</link>
      <description>The Commercial Tax Tribunal granted an interim stay for 80% of the tax liability imposed on the sale of SIM cards and fixed telephone service rentals for the assessment year 2007-08. The Tribunal directed the revisionist to deposit the remaining 20% during the pendency of the first appeal. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering the prima facie case on merits and the financial condition of the appellant when granting interim relief, citing relevant legal precedents. The first appellate authority was instructed to expedite the appeal decision within two months and ordered a stay on coercive measures against the assessee during this period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246058</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>