<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 476 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246039</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the decision to delete the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) as the assessee did not furnish inaccurate particulars. The ITAT emphasized that the mere disallowance of certain claims does not automatically warrant a penalty under the said section. The judgment was pronounced on 11th April, 2014.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2014 10:05:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352206" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 476 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246039</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the decision to delete the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) as the assessee did not furnish inaccurate particulars. The ITAT emphasized that the mere disallowance of certain claims does not automatically warrant a penalty under the said section. The judgment was pronounced on 11th April, 2014.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246039</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>