https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246029 Delay of 775 days in filing an appeal under FEMA was held not condonable because the explanation showed inaction and negligence, with no satisfactory day-to-day account of the delay. The High Court treated the limitation framework for appeals as procedural and applicable as on the date of filing, but held that this did not allow extension beyond the statutory outer limit without sufficient cause. On that basis, the appeal was treated as not maintainable within the prescribed limitation scheme. en-us Thu, 03 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Apr 2014 08:54:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246029 Delay of 775 days in filing an appeal under FEMA was held not condonable because the explanation showed inaction and negligence, with no satisfactory day-to-day account of the delay. The High Court treated the limitation framework for appeals as procedural and applicable as on the date of filing, but held that this did not allow extension beyond the statutory outer limit without sufficient cause. On that basis, the appeal was treated as not maintainable within the prescribed limitation scheme. Case-Laws FEMA Thu, 03 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246029