<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 462 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246025</link>
    <description>Under Section 37C of the Central Excise Act, deemed service depends on actual tender, delivery, or service in the prescribed manner, not merely dispatch by registered post. The appellate authority had not ascertained when the original order was in fact served and therefore could not properly decide whether the appeal was time-barred; on that basis, the limitation rejection was unsustainable and the matter required fresh consideration of service and limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2014 14:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352191" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 462 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246025</link>
      <description>Under Section 37C of the Central Excise Act, deemed service depends on actual tender, delivery, or service in the prescribed manner, not merely dispatch by registered post. The appellate authority had not ascertained when the original order was in fact served and therefore could not properly decide whether the appeal was time-barred; on that basis, the limitation rejection was unsustainable and the matter required fresh consideration of service and limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246025</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>