https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246024 The High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the previous order, and remanded the case to the Tribunal for reconsideration. The Tribunal was directed to determine the appellant's liability for duty in the Financial Year 1999-2000 under Rule 96 ZO(3) specifically, considering whether the appellant had given any declaration or option for that year. The Tribunal was instructed to expedite the decision within three months from the date of the order. en-us Mon, 07 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Nov 2014 12:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246024 The High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the previous order, and remanded the case to the Tribunal for reconsideration. The Tribunal was directed to determine the appellant's liability for duty in the Financial Year 1999-2000 under Rule 96 ZO(3) specifically, considering whether the appellant had given any declaration or option for that year. The Tribunal was instructed to expedite the decision within three months from the date of the order. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 07 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246024