<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 456 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246019</link>
    <description>The court directed the appellant to make a predeposit of Rs.1,00,000/- for appeal admission within 4 weeks, with a reporting date of 15.2.2013. The balance of dues would be waived and recovery stayed pending the appeal, subject to the predeposit. The judgment emphasized the need to differentiate between inputs used for capital goods fabrication and those for supporting structures, with the decision influenced by the interpretation of legal precedents and ongoing judicial challenges.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2014 08:13:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352185" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 456 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246019</link>
      <description>The court directed the appellant to make a predeposit of Rs.1,00,000/- for appeal admission within 4 weeks, with a reporting date of 15.2.2013. The balance of dues would be waived and recovery stayed pending the appeal, subject to the predeposit. The judgment emphasized the need to differentiate between inputs used for capital goods fabrication and those for supporting structures, with the decision influenced by the interpretation of legal precedents and ongoing judicial challenges.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246019</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>