https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246018 The judgment in the case addressed the denial of CENVAT credit for structural steel items used to support capital goods in plant and machinery. The court directed the appellant to make a 50% predeposit of the duty demanded for appeal admission within a specified timeframe. The balance of dues would be waived, and recovery stayed during the appeal process if the predeposit was made on time. en-us Fri, 11 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Apr 2014 08:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246018 The judgment in the case addressed the denial of CENVAT credit for structural steel items used to support capital goods in plant and machinery. The court directed the appellant to make a 50% predeposit of the duty demanded for appeal admission within a specified timeframe. The balance of dues would be waived, and recovery stayed during the appeal process if the predeposit was made on time. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 11 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246018