<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 629 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163919</link>
    <description>Additional sales tax could not be levied on the basis of excise assessable value or any other hypothetical price when the actual completed sale reflected a disclosed consideration. The governing principle applied was that sales tax must bear a real nexus to the taxable sale and the price actually received or receivable, and a notional value cannot replace the contract price. The Revenue was required to prove under-billing or extra collection from the invoices, returns, and books of account, but no such material was shown. The declared sale price therefore remained the proper tax base, and the assessee succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2014 19:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352155" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 629 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163919</link>
      <description>Additional sales tax could not be levied on the basis of excise assessable value or any other hypothetical price when the actual completed sale reflected a disclosed consideration. The governing principle applied was that sales tax must bear a real nexus to the taxable sale and the price actually received or receivable, and a notional value cannot replace the contract price. The Revenue was required to prove under-billing or extra collection from the invoices, returns, and books of account, but no such material was shown. The declared sale price therefore remained the proper tax base, and the assessee succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163919</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>