https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163904 A power of attorney holder was held incompetent to institute and maintain criminal complaints where the federation's bye-laws vested the power to sue and be sued in the Managing Director, and no material showed authorisation from the Board of Directors for any further delegation. In the absence of express authority from the competent governing body, the general power of attorney executed by the Managing Director did not validly extend to prosecution of complaints under Section 200 CrPC or the connected appeals. The dismissal of the complaints was therefore justified. en-us Mon, 18 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Apr 2014 12:28:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163904 A power of attorney holder was held incompetent to institute and maintain criminal complaints where the federation's bye-laws vested the power to sue and be sued in the Managing Director, and no material showed authorisation from the Board of Directors for any further delegation. In the absence of express authority from the competent governing body, the general power of attorney executed by the Managing Director did not validly extend to prosecution of complaints under Section 200 CrPC or the connected appeals. The dismissal of the complaints was therefore justified. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 18 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163904