<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (10) TMI 418 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163901</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the inclusion of silk fabrics and sarees made of natural silk as taxable items under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act. It held that the State had the authority to levy tax on these items, despite their inclusion in the First Schedule to the Additional Duties of Excise Act. The court found that the State Legislature retained the power to impose tax on such goods, distinguishing previous decisions cited by the petitioners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2014 12:14:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352130" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (10) TMI 418 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163901</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the inclusion of silk fabrics and sarees made of natural silk as taxable items under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act. It held that the State had the authority to levy tax on these items, despite their inclusion in the First Schedule to the Additional Duties of Excise Act. The court found that the State Legislature retained the power to impose tax on such goods, distinguishing previous decisions cited by the petitioners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163901</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>