<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 614 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163896</link>
    <description>Kerosene oil used only as fuel in the calcination stage for manufacturing titanium dioxide is not an industrial raw material under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963. The relevant test is whether the input goes into the making of the finished product, forms part of the manufacturing stream, or is consumed in a way that leaves it physically identifiable in the end product. Because kerosene operated merely as an aid to the process and did not physically enter or remain identifiable in titanium dioxide, it did not qualify for concessional treatment or form 18 declarations. The denial of concessional tax treatment for such fuel use was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2014 12:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352125" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 614 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163896</link>
      <description>Kerosene oil used only as fuel in the calcination stage for manufacturing titanium dioxide is not an industrial raw material under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963. The relevant test is whether the input goes into the making of the finished product, forms part of the manufacturing stream, or is consumed in a way that leaves it physically identifiable in the end product. Because kerosene operated merely as an aid to the process and did not physically enter or remain identifiable in titanium dioxide, it did not qualify for concessional treatment or form 18 declarations. The denial of concessional tax treatment for such fuel use was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163896</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>