<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 579 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163895</link>
    <description>Goods sold to an industrial unit qualified for concessional sales tax where they were used in manufacture or processing within the State. The expression &quot;use in manufacture&quot; was held not to be confined to consumption as industrial raw material alone; a restrictive reading would render the notification redundant alongside the concession already available under the Act. Rubber gloves used by workers in a refinery were treated as essential to the manufacturing activity, and the purchaser&#039;s declaration supported the concession, subject to action against the purchaser for non-use or misdeclaration. The assessee was entitled to the concessional rate on the declared turnover.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2014 11:11:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352124" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 579 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163895</link>
      <description>Goods sold to an industrial unit qualified for concessional sales tax where they were used in manufacture or processing within the State. The expression &quot;use in manufacture&quot; was held not to be confined to consumption as industrial raw material alone; a restrictive reading would render the notification redundant alongside the concession already available under the Act. Rubber gloves used by workers in a refinery were treated as essential to the manufacturing activity, and the purchaser&#039;s declaration supported the concession, subject to action against the purchaser for non-use or misdeclaration. The assessee was entitled to the concessional rate on the declared turnover.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163895</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>