<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 752 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163883</link>
    <description>Refund claims under the sales tax law cannot be rejected after reassessment orders have attained finality unless express statutory authority permits withholding. The Court noted that no order was passed under the withholding provision, and the dealer was not heard or subjected to the enquiry required by the rules, so the rejection lacked legal basis and was liable to be quashed. Where a refund application is wrongly kept pending beyond the prescribed period, statutory interest follows from the date of filing of the application until payment, because unexplained delay amounts to unlawful retention of the dealer&#039;s money.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2014 14:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352108" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 752 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163883</link>
      <description>Refund claims under the sales tax law cannot be rejected after reassessment orders have attained finality unless express statutory authority permits withholding. The Court noted that no order was passed under the withholding provision, and the dealer was not heard or subjected to the enquiry required by the rules, so the rejection lacked legal basis and was liable to be quashed. Where a refund application is wrongly kept pending beyond the prescribed period, statutory interest follows from the date of filing of the application until payment, because unexplained delay amounts to unlawful retention of the dealer&#039;s money.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163883</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>