<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 648 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163879</link>
    <description>The amended revisional power under section 46(4) of the Bihar Finance Act is confined to orders that are erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of Revenue; that requirement is mandatory and cannot be diluted by interpretation. The commentary also notes that a statutory appeal may validly be regulated by pre-deposit conditions, and the separate limitation on suo motu revision does not amount to hostile discrimination or violate Articles 14, 19(1)(g) or 300A.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 11:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352104" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 648 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163879</link>
      <description>The amended revisional power under section 46(4) of the Bihar Finance Act is confined to orders that are erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of Revenue; that requirement is mandatory and cannot be diluted by interpretation. The commentary also notes that a statutory appeal may validly be regulated by pre-deposit conditions, and the separate limitation on suo motu revision does not amount to hostile discrimination or violate Articles 14, 19(1)(g) or 300A.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163879</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>