<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 689 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163856</link>
    <description>A supply contract concluded between parties in different States, executed by movement of goods pursuant to that contract, was treated as an inter-State sale under the Central Sales Tax regime. Because Central sales tax had already been paid and declaration forms were produced, the transaction was not regarded as a local sale liable to U.P. trade tax. The principle applied is that where inter-State movement of goods is integral to performance of a pre-existing cross-State contract, the sale falls outside the recipient State&#039;s local trade tax net.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 18:05:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352081" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 689 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163856</link>
      <description>A supply contract concluded between parties in different States, executed by movement of goods pursuant to that contract, was treated as an inter-State sale under the Central Sales Tax regime. Because Central sales tax had already been paid and declaration forms were produced, the transaction was not regarded as a local sale liable to U.P. trade tax. The principle applied is that where inter-State movement of goods is integral to performance of a pre-existing cross-State contract, the sale falls outside the recipient State&#039;s local trade tax net.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163856</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>