<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 447 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246010</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the constitutionality of Clause (zzzzv) of Section 65(105) of the Finance Act, 2010, dismissing the Writ Petition challenging the Parliament&#039;s competence to levy service tax on air-conditioned restaurants serving food and beverages. It held that the service tax did not encroach upon the State&#039;s power to levy sales tax, emphasizing the distinction between the two taxes and rejecting claims of double taxation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2014 17:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352055" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 447 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246010</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the constitutionality of Clause (zzzzv) of Section 65(105) of the Finance Act, 2010, dismissing the Writ Petition challenging the Parliament&#039;s competence to levy service tax on air-conditioned restaurants serving food and beverages. It held that the service tax did not encroach upon the State&#039;s power to levy sales tax, emphasizing the distinction between the two taxes and rejecting claims of double taxation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246010</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>