https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246007 The appellant successfully challenged the denial of CENVAT Credit on courier services by demonstrating compliance with Rule 6(3)(c) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The court emphasized adherence to the 20% limit for utilizing the credit on taxable output services. Additionally, the appellant's proactive reversal of proportionate credit for exempted services under the Finance Act, 2010, further supported their case. The judgment ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the previous decision and allowing the appeal. en-us Fri, 04 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 Jul 2015 12:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246007 The appellant successfully challenged the denial of CENVAT Credit on courier services by demonstrating compliance with Rule 6(3)(c) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The court emphasized adherence to the 20% limit for utilizing the credit on taxable output services. Additionally, the appellant's proactive reversal of proportionate credit for exempted services under the Finance Act, 2010, further supported their case. The judgment ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the previous decision and allowing the appeal. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 04 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246007