<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 437 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246000</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete certain additions due to insufficient reasoning provided by the AO. The judgment emphasized the importance of objective assessments and valid justifications for disallowances, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeal and the allowance of the assessee&#039;s challenge to the sustained additions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2014 21:20:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352045" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 437 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246000</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete certain additions due to insufficient reasoning provided by the AO. The judgment emphasized the importance of objective assessments and valid justifications for disallowances, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeal and the allowance of the assessee&#039;s challenge to the sustained additions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246000</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>