<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 434 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245997</link>
    <description>A co-operative society satisfying the statutory attributes of a primary co-operative bank falls within section 80P(4) and is excluded from deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i). Applying the Banking Regulation Act definitions, the tribunal tested whether the assessee&#039;s principal business was banking, whether its paid-up share capital and reserves crossed the prescribed limit, and whether its bye-laws barred admission of other co-operative societies as members. On the bye-laws and the admitted acceptance of deposits from non-members, all statutory conditions were met. Deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) was therefore not allowable, and the denial of relief was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2014 21:17:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352042" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 434 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245997</link>
      <description>A co-operative society satisfying the statutory attributes of a primary co-operative bank falls within section 80P(4) and is excluded from deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i). Applying the Banking Regulation Act definitions, the tribunal tested whether the assessee&#039;s principal business was banking, whether its paid-up share capital and reserves crossed the prescribed limit, and whether its bye-laws barred admission of other co-operative societies as members. On the bye-laws and the admitted acceptance of deposits from non-members, all statutory conditions were met. Deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) was therefore not allowable, and the denial of relief was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245997</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>