<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 423 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245986</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the re-opened assessments for the years 2002-03 and 2003-04 due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to specify the assessee&#039;s failure to disclose material facts. However, for the year 2004-05, the re-opening was upheld, and the issue of the claim for deduction under section 10A was remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh examination following specific principles and guidelines.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2014 17:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352030" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 423 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245986</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the re-opened assessments for the years 2002-03 and 2003-04 due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to specify the assessee&#039;s failure to disclose material facts. However, for the year 2004-05, the re-opening was upheld, and the issue of the claim for deduction under section 10A was remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh examination following specific principles and guidelines.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245986</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>