<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 728 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245965</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the appellant&#039;s request for waiver of the pre-deposit condition concerning duty demand, interest, and penalties. This decision was based on the appellant&#039;s strong prima facie case, the unintentional nature of the errors, and conflicting interpretations of Rule 8(3A) by various tribunal benches. The recovery was stayed pending further orders, and the appeal was set for additional proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2014 14:56:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352006" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 728 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245965</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the appellant&#039;s request for waiver of the pre-deposit condition concerning duty demand, interest, and penalties. This decision was based on the appellant&#039;s strong prima facie case, the unintentional nature of the errors, and conflicting interpretations of Rule 8(3A) by various tribunal benches. The recovery was stayed pending further orders, and the appeal was set for additional proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245965</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>