<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 529 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245962</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit is unavailable on inputs found to have been used exclusively in manufacturing exempted goods cleared under Notification No. 6/2002-C.E., because Rule 6(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 bars such credit unless the statutory exceptions are satisfied. A mere reversal of an amount calculated at 8% of the value of exempted clearances does not override that prohibition where there is no proof that the inputs were used for dutiable final products. On limitation, absence of a clear disclosure to the department supported invocation of the extended period. Penalty relief was limited to the reduced option indicated on payment of duty and interest within the stipulated time.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2014 14:54:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=352003" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 529 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245962</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit is unavailable on inputs found to have been used exclusively in manufacturing exempted goods cleared under Notification No. 6/2002-C.E., because Rule 6(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 bars such credit unless the statutory exceptions are satisfied. A mere reversal of an amount calculated at 8% of the value of exempted clearances does not override that prohibition where there is no proof that the inputs were used for dutiable final products. On limitation, absence of a clear disclosure to the department supported invocation of the extended period. Penalty relief was limited to the reduced option indicated on payment of duty and interest within the stipulated time.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245962</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>