<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 498 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245958</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the demand for excise duty due to a discrepancy in the description of goods in export documents. The decision was based on the clear correlation between the ARE-1s and shipping bills, indicating the actual export of goods by the manufacturer. The Tribunal found that the evidence supported the appellant&#039;s position, leading to a favorable outcome and dismissal of the excise duty demand amounting to Rs. 4,15,740.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2014 14:52:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351999" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 498 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245958</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the demand for excise duty due to a discrepancy in the description of goods in export documents. The decision was based on the clear correlation between the ARE-1s and shipping bills, indicating the actual export of goods by the manufacturer. The Tribunal found that the evidence supported the appellant&#039;s position, leading to a favorable outcome and dismissal of the excise duty demand amounting to Rs. 4,15,740.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245958</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>