<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 517 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245945</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appellant&#039;s stay application, directing them to deposit the entire duty demand with interest and penalty within a specified timeframe. The appellant&#039;s attempt to re-credit Cenvat credit without departmental approval was deemed incorrect, and their arguments regarding natural justice violations were not substantiated. The Tribunal emphasized the need for adherence to established procedures and denied the waiver of financial obligations during the appeal process. Compliance with the directive was scheduled for a future date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2014 14:40:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351986" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 517 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245945</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appellant&#039;s stay application, directing them to deposit the entire duty demand with interest and penalty within a specified timeframe. The appellant&#039;s attempt to re-credit Cenvat credit without departmental approval was deemed incorrect, and their arguments regarding natural justice violations were not substantiated. The Tribunal emphasized the need for adherence to established procedures and denied the waiver of financial obligations during the appeal process. Compliance with the directive was scheduled for a future date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245945</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>