<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 516 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245943</link>
    <description>Simultaneous availment of Notification No. 29/2004-CE for domestic clearances and Notification No. 59/2008 for export clearances was treated as prima facie permissible at the stay stage. The Tribunal relied on an earlier stay order on the same arrangement and held that no immediate pre-deposit was warranted pending final hearing. Departmental reliance on Circular No. 937/27/2010-CX did not displace that prima facie view, so recovery was stayed until disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2014 14:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351984" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 516 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245943</link>
      <description>Simultaneous availment of Notification No. 29/2004-CE for domestic clearances and Notification No. 59/2008 for export clearances was treated as prima facie permissible at the stay stage. The Tribunal relied on an earlier stay order on the same arrangement and held that no immediate pre-deposit was warranted pending final hearing. Departmental reliance on Circular No. 937/27/2010-CX did not displace that prima facie view, so recovery was stayed until disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245943</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>