<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 724 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245941</link>
    <description>The appellate authority confirmed the duty demand, finding in favor of the Revenue that the goods were indeed dyed fabrics based on evidence. The Tribunal granted a concessional penalty, remanding the case for verification of duty and interest payments. The appellant was allowed to pay a penalty of 25% of the duty along with the remaining balance of duty and interest within one month.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 17:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351982" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 724 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245941</link>
      <description>The appellate authority confirmed the duty demand, finding in favor of the Revenue that the goods were indeed dyed fabrics based on evidence. The Tribunal granted a concessional penalty, remanding the case for verification of duty and interest payments. The appellant was allowed to pay a penalty of 25% of the duty along with the remaining balance of duty and interest within one month.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245941</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>