<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 398 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245927</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, directing the issue to be re-examined by the A.O. with a reasonable opportunity for the assessee. The Tribunal found the dismissal of the appeal by Ld. CIT(A) in-limine improper due to the change of address affecting proper service of notices. The matter was resolved by restoring it to the A.O. for re-examination, considering the assessee&#039;s justification for the added amount based on mutual fund purchases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2014 12:31:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351948" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 398 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245927</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, directing the issue to be re-examined by the A.O. with a reasonable opportunity for the assessee. The Tribunal found the dismissal of the appeal by Ld. CIT(A) in-limine improper due to the change of address affecting proper service of notices. The matter was resolved by restoring it to the A.O. for re-examination, considering the assessee&#039;s justification for the added amount based on mutual fund purchases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245927</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>