<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 381 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245910</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside penalties on importers and CHA personnel due to lack of awareness or control over fraudulent activities. Storage terminals were held accountable for procedural lapses but not penalized for the fraud itself. Individual liability for forgery was upheld, emphasizing adherence to customs regulations and penalties for deliberate violations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2015 18:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351925" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 381 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245910</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside penalties on importers and CHA personnel due to lack of awareness or control over fraudulent activities. Storage terminals were held accountable for procedural lapses but not penalized for the fraud itself. Individual liability for forgery was upheld, emphasizing adherence to customs regulations and penalties for deliberate violations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245910</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>