https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245900 The Tribunal held that sawdust, as a byproduct of plywood manufacturing, did not qualify as a consciously manufactured product under excise laws. Marketability alone was insufficient for excisable goods classification. Therefore, the demand on the appellant under Rule 6(3)(b) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, amounting to Rs.35,100/- was deemed unsustainable, resulting in a waiver and stay on the adjudged dues. en-us Fri, 11 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 12 Apr 2014 10:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245900 The Tribunal held that sawdust, as a byproduct of plywood manufacturing, did not qualify as a consciously manufactured product under excise laws. Marketability alone was insufficient for excisable goods classification. Therefore, the demand on the appellant under Rule 6(3)(b) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, amounting to Rs.35,100/- was deemed unsustainable, resulting in a waiver and stay on the adjudged dues. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 11 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245900