https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163831 Ready-to-fry snack pellets sold as Fryums were held not to qualify as "papad" under entry 40 of the First Schedule to the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 because tax classification depends on the product's commercial identity and ordinary understanding, not merely on resemblance or use. On that basis, the goods were treated as non-scheduled goods taxable under the residual charging provision in section 4(1)(b), and the exemption claim failed. en-us Mon, 03 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Apr 2014 13:10:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163831 Ready-to-fry snack pellets sold as Fryums were held not to qualify as "papad" under entry 40 of the First Schedule to the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 because tax classification depends on the product's commercial identity and ordinary understanding, not merely on resemblance or use. On that basis, the goods were treated as non-scheduled goods taxable under the residual charging provision in section 4(1)(b), and the exemption claim failed. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 03 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163831