<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Invalidates Reassessment Notice: Reasons Recorded After Issuance Violates Jurisdiction Rules.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=18133</link>
    <description>Reassessment - date of notice is 30-1-2004 and the reasons recorded are clearly dated 4-2-2004, i.e., the reasons are not recorded before the issue of notice but afterwards, the assumption of jurisdiction is clearly bad - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 13:45:12 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 13:45:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351865" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Invalidates Reassessment Notice: Reasons Recorded After Issuance Violates Jurisdiction Rules.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=18133</link>
      <description>Reassessment - date of notice is 30-1-2004 and the reasons recorded are clearly dated 4-2-2004, i.e., the reasons are not recorded before the issue of notice but afterwards, the assumption of jurisdiction is clearly bad - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 13:45:12 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=18133</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>