<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 366 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245895</link>
    <description>Penalty for delayed deposit of tax deducted at source under the Uttarakhand VAT Act is discretionary and cannot be imposed automatically. The assessing authority must hear the assessee and consider the surrounding facts, including whether the delay arose from circumstances beyond deliberate default. Here, the assessee had prepared drafts in time, offered to bear collection charges, and attempted deposit, but the banker refused outstation drafts; the tax was later deposited and statutory interest for delay had already been paid. On those facts, the authorities were found to have given insufficient weight to the assessee&#039;s conduct, and the maximum penalty was considered unwarranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2015 11:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351844" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 366 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245895</link>
      <description>Penalty for delayed deposit of tax deducted at source under the Uttarakhand VAT Act is discretionary and cannot be imposed automatically. The assessing authority must hear the assessee and consider the surrounding facts, including whether the delay arose from circumstances beyond deliberate default. Here, the assessee had prepared drafts in time, offered to bear collection charges, and attempted deposit, but the banker refused outstation drafts; the tax was later deposited and statutory interest for delay had already been paid. On those facts, the authorities were found to have given insufficient weight to the assessee&#039;s conduct, and the maximum penalty was considered unwarranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245895</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>