https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163820 The court upheld the three times addition of estimated suppression and penalty imposition on a dealer in sweets and savouries for the year 1998-99. The appellant's challenge to the multiplier of 3 for the addition was rejected, but the penalty was directed to be calculated based on the actual suppression amount of Rs. 1,31,892. The decision was in line with the precedent of A.V.K. Marimuthu Nadar and Bros. v. State of Tamil Nadu [1981] 47 STC 314 (Mad). The tax case was partly allowed with no costs incurred. en-us Thu, 06 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Apr 2014 11:26:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163820 The court upheld the three times addition of estimated suppression and penalty imposition on a dealer in sweets and savouries for the year 1998-99. The appellant's challenge to the multiplier of 3 for the addition was rejected, but the penalty was directed to be calculated based on the actual suppression amount of Rs. 1,31,892. The decision was in line with the precedent of A.V.K. Marimuthu Nadar and Bros. v. State of Tamil Nadu [1981] 47 STC 314 (Mad). The tax case was partly allowed with no costs incurred. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 06 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163820